Radical Islam in the House

I’ve started listening to The Janet Mefford Show, downloading (Available through iPlayer) to listen on the way to work. I listened for the first time to Dr Oliphint (Covenantal Apologetics) on the show and was pretty shocked by some of the other stuff – particularly the Homosexual ideology and Islam. I was a bit skeptical to begin with, the concern was if Janet was a fundamentalist nutcase. Some of her callers gave me that impression. But I have to say she has some excellent guests and to be honest I now lament afresh the fact there is nothing like it over here in the UK. It would probably be shut down over here as a show that promotes hate speech – even though that’s far from the truth. Disagreement is becoming more and more problematic. I heard via another online broadcaster (not Janet) the term ‘Gaystapo’ for the first time to describe the Homosexual lobby / agenda / ideology. Whilst the term may not be that helpful I think we get the point. Basically, disagree and expect to be dealt with. And it’s really no different when it comes to Islam. The cry of Islamophobe is fairly common here – we had it from the BBC Question Time audience just last Thursday – compete with (measured) applause.

Back to the point of the post. It was on Janet’s show (yesterday I think) I heard an interview with Dr Michael Coffman to discuss his book ‘Radical Islam in the House’. Whether he went too far in his prognosis is hard to say, but if 10% of what he says is true America (Could be too late for us, unless the Lord graciously steps in) seriously needs to wake up – and fast. I know nothing of Michael Coffman but I’m about to order the book on kindle – here’s the blurb below:

Product DetailsProduct Description
Radical Islam In the House exposes the very real Islamist threat to America. It’s no longer lurking at America’s door, it has already penetrated deeply into the federal government and our culture. The over arching goal of the leadership of every major Islamic sect is to create a global Caliphate or world government.

Iran wants to create world chaos to allow the Shi’ite Muslims to form a Shia Caliphate. While allowing Iran to obtain the nuclear bomb will be catastrophic, there is an equally dangerous Islamist cancer that is systematically Islamizing American politics and culture; Wahhabi Islam.

Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabi Islam is the foundation of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. Al Qaeda uses violence, while the Muslim Brotherhood uses stealth and deception. By preying on political correctness, they have convinced most Americans they are peaceful, share the same God and want to coexist. While peaceful coexistence may be what the average Muslim wants, it is not true of the Islamic Brotherhood leadership. The Brotherhood has a well-developed, step-by-step plan to turn America into an Islamic controlled nation within a few years as part of their world Caliphate.

Nearly all Muslims believe that the return of the Mahdi, their messiah, is eminent. When that happens he will lead Islam into global conquest and a global Caliphate. This story quite literally leaps off the pages of the Bible in ways non-Jews, Christians and even Muslims will find shocking.

Very few Americans know that Obama’s Kenyan family is steeped in Wahhabi Islam, or that prior to the 2008 election Egyptian TV and radio bragged that a Muslim was going to be president. The implications are stunning and should be understood by everyone — before it is too late.

6 thoughts on “Radical Islam in the House

  1. Wow, we have a lot a parallel thoughts. I first heard of her in light of Oliphint’s new book but as I looked around, I was a bit cautious and discerning that it wasn’t going to be a crazy end times crazy speculation conspiracy type of show.

    1. Yup, that’s pretty much what I thought. There is some of that stuff in there but I think Janet Mefford has her head screwed on. I heard today in an interview with Gary Williams (a Brit :-)) she reads John Owen!

    1. That’s a good question. I’m hoping the book will provide some answers. You can be sure it’s out of self interest though. I suspect the answer will not be simple. What’s your take on it?

      1. As Islamic history has always shown resistance to hereditary monarchy, Saudi Arabia has done as much as it possibly could to establish it’s “legitimacy” as a monarchical state. So far, it has done pretty well, especially within the rigid Saudi Arabian cultural hierarchy. But Western and democratic influence is only growing globally, and it’s right to have a monarchy is always in danger. The House of Saud has framed itself as a rightful Muslim, and the Muslim Brotherhood claims the same. The issue is that the Brotherhood is democratic, and legitimate by those who vote for them across the Arab World. Certainly, the very existence of the Brotherhood is a threat to Saud Arabia’s power.

        In other words, the Saudi Arabian government is doing everything possible to prevent (most especially) non-secular Muslim democracies, the ones that threaten their aristocratic control the most. What do you think? Cheers.

        Lux

  2. Lux, My understanding is The Muslim Brotherhood only give the appearance of democracy. But I’m just learning about all this. I’ll read the book and maybe come back.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.